Common Mistakes Made in Functional Java

05 Sep

5:00 pm

848

Description

This is a virtual Meetup occurring at 5PM UK time (BST), here’s a timezone calculator (https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Virtual+JUG+Session%3A+Common+mistakes+made+in+Functional+Java&iso=20180905T17&p1=136&ah=1).

When the time comes, you can tune in to the live session at virtualJUG.com (http://virtualJUG.com/)

Join us on slack for the live discussion before, during and after the session: https://goo.gl/ELDDcp

Abstract:

In Java 8 functional style programming was introduced in Java. Java 9 extended this with some nice new features. For many people it is hard to grasp the idea of functional style programming after so many years of purely working in the imperative OOP style. The opportunities Java gives us out of the box are massive, but with great power comes great responsibility.

Brian points out common mistakes that are made when integrating functional style programming in your every day Java project and how to prevent this. This way you can write better, cleaner and more readable code. But even more important, you will be able to utilize the functional code constructions in Java 9 to it’s full potential… and maybe, you even start to like it.

Speaker: Brian Vermeer

Brian is a Software Engineer at Blue4IT working consultancy based on all sorts of Java projects for the Top-100 companies in the Netherlands. He is passionate about Java, (Pure) Functional Programming and Cybersecurity. He is a regular conference speaker on events like JFall, JBCNConf, Oracle Code, Devoxx, JavaZone, JFokus and JavaOne. Besides being an engineer he is a Reservist at the Royal Netherlands Air Force and a Taekwondo Master.

Leave a comment

You should login with GitHub to comment

Be updated, subscribe to our signals

Inviting for a beer
See you there!

Thank you for RSVPing. Please, keep culture high and remove RSVP once you now you can not make it.

Well done!

Your commit was pushed to GitOrbit, let`s see what other guys think about it.

Ooops!

Something wrong...

You already like this article!

Please authorize!

sign in